Leather implications arise from Mosstrich-KKI merger

16/08/2019
Regarding the tanneries that Mosstrich and KKI run at Mossel Bay and Oudtshoorn respectively, South Africa’s competition tribunal stipulated on approving the merger between the two that the companies must continue to “offer access to [the] tanneries to any party requiring access on terms that are fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory”. If the merged company declines access to its tanneries, it must provide “detailed and specific written reasons within seven days of receiving the request”.

A further condition concerns particular customers of the two producers. KKI and Mosstrich’s customers are ostrich farmers who send birds for slaughter at abattoirs run by the two companies for the processing of the meat, with the skins and feathers being processed separately.

According to the tribunal’s decision, two customers, Buffelskom Boerdery and Ostriland, are to have current arrangements with Mosstrich “preserved indefinitely”. Any party that does wish to cancel the arrangement has to give 24 months’ notice.

The case of Ostriland is straightforward. This company raises ostriches and set up its own tannery in Citrusdal in the Western Cape in 1996 to “optimise the yield”. The Mosstrich abattoir carries out the slaughter of Ostriland birds and returns the skins (along with the meat and the feathers) to Ostriland for processing into leather at Citrusdal. The tribunal decision gives Ostriland the right to keep this set-up in place.

Buffelskom, on the other hand, has its own abattoir but does not have its own tannery at the moment. It has been using Mosstrich’s South Cape Ostrich Tannery for contract tanning for several years and markets its own leather. The tribunal has decided that Buffelskom must be allowed to keep this arrangement in place and must also be allowed to set up its own tannery if it decides to do so.