David Peters column: substitute materials can be good news

24/10/2017
In a new blog entry, ‘Duplicity and hypocritical brands’, the leatherbiz columnist takes finished product brands and retailers to task for appearing to promote high standards of environmental and social care from their suppliers while, in some cases, choosing to buy from companies that deliberately fail to live up to those standards to save money.

He also wondered if prominent brands were preparing to put equally strict requirements for social and environmental good practice on the suppliers involved in making some of the alternative materials to leather that have earned high levels of publicity in recent months.

At the end of the column, however, David Peters suggested that increased use of these alternative materials will be good news for leather for the simple reason that high volumes of hides will still be available for tanners to work with. Using synthetic or biofabricated materials instead of leather will do nothing to stop the meat industry’s slaughter of cattle, from which hides and skins are a by-product.

But what the use of the alternative materials will do, he insisted, is make hides and skins cheaper, to make sure tanners keep buying them and use them to make high-quality but cheaper leather.