The Lineapelle exhibition in Milan (September 23-25) once again confirmed its role as the central semi-annual hub for the global leather industry and allied sectors. Because it coincides with Milan Fashion Week and the Simac-Tanning Tech show, the spectrum of attendees is broad. Distinct visitor groups, who rarely converge in day-to-day business, can meet. Creative directors, buyers, engineers, and production leads come together to discuss material aesthetics, quality parameters, process requirements and delivery capabilities, translating ideas into realistic product paths more quickly.

This concentration of functions across the value chain is the fair’s real edge. Decisions that would typically take weeks can take minutes at Lineapelle because the right people are in the room, physical samples are on the table and technical details can be clarified without intermediaries.

On the catwalks, leather is visible yet often plays a decorative role: an accent, a tactile contrast, a visual spark for textile silhouettes. Conversations with creatives nonetheless underscore that leather retains a unique, irreplaceable status. The reasons are consistent: touch, patina, repairability, longevity, warm thermal behaviour on skin, and a characteristic smell that synthetics can only approximate. In the mass-copying fast-fashion segment, however, leather remains a minority choice. Cost and processing considerations dominate, unless consumers explicitly demand the material and accept the associated price points. When they do not, substitutes can win because they are cheaper to process. Also, design in these tiers prioritises look over long-term performance.

Simac-Tanning Tech, running in parallel, makes the industry’s technical priorities explicit: process optimisation, defect detection, connected production data, transparency, energy efficiency, and material utilisation. The technology promises more consistent grain, reproducibility and less waste. These technologies are globally available; they confer no exclusive regional advantage to Europe. Cost disadvantages, driven by energy and labour costs, and the gradual erosion of downstream processing capacity cannot be offset by technology alone. Technology is necessary, but not sufficient.

Advantage emerges where data competence, service speed, short lead-times, small minimum order quantities, reliable re-dyes, and fast claims decisions work together. If clusters can span tanning, cutting, prototyping and finishing, this, too, can be an advantage because it can compress time-to-market.

Within the Lineapelle halls, material trends were clear. Lighter calf and lamb with buttery hand-feel, semi-aniline transparency, and matte luxury surfaces dominated. Broken naturals, deep blacks, dark berry shades and muted petrol defined palettes. Highly reflective metallics receded in favour of subtler, micro-shimmer effects. Natural grain with sporty embossing was in demand, especially where hide quality is high enough to carry transparent finishes without masking layers.

On the process side, hybrid tannages, from metal-free to low-metal, continue to mature. They are less a lofty sustainability narrative than a pragmatic response to emission, water, and repeatability demands from brands. In parallel, data discipline is improving. 

Overlaying all of this is a pronounced uncertainty about the future, felt across the chain with varying intensity. Automotive and furniture leather manufacturers are currently hardest hit by weak orders and deteriorating consumer sentiment.

Capacity is dialled down, investments are postponed or reduced to maintenance; key accounts matter more. Leathergoods and footwear are holding up better. Here, run-rates hinge less on end demand than on reluctance to commit. The result is smaller lots, later releases and more options that can be exercised if needed, a logic that rewards short-term flexibility and penalises rigid minimums.

For tanneries, fragmentation, flexibility, and specialisation are the new centre of gravity. Those who enable small minimum order quantities, compress lead times, deliver stable reproducibility and prove good service speed remain in the game.

Leather can defend its position in demanding segments because usage properties matter and consumers are willing to pay for comfort, longevity and repairability. The core problem lies where leather, as a material, can hardly be defended in mass production. Alternatives look convincing enough to win the short-distance purchase and processing advantages are tangible for many factories.

Performance attributes, such as breathability, lifespan or repairability are often neither measured nor communicated in these segments. It is therefore unsurprising and somewhat discouraging that, even at a fair such as Lineapelle, a notable number of exhibitors presented alternative materials that look like leather but have little to do with leather in reality. 

This communication gap remains the industry’s quiet handicap. If brands do not choose leather deliberately, if retail teams lack simple, tangible arguments, and if data sheets describe chemical paths but not usage-relevant properties, the material will not land in consumers’ minds. The outcome is a look-driven market, judging leather by appearance, while its true strength lies beyond appearances.

For tanneries, influence on future adoption remains limited until brands themselves make a clear material choice for leather and carry it through product, packaging and communication. Visible material signatures, co-branding, comparison swatches, retail training, and simple, verifiable KPIs on breathability, flex performance and repairability make the difference.

Even as certification bodies celebrate their work, pushback grows once the newest audit concepts are discussed in operational detail. The promises, that certifications would lead to benefits in the market, have not been met in practice. Production and sales keep trending down while direct and indirect costs remain significant, with no tangible benefit. The parties footing the bill, the tanneries, do not benefit, and the parties demanding certificates, the brands and manufacturers, are not willing to pay for them. If they perceive real value, they should accept price uplifts.

Few have the courage to abandon certifications outright, yet workarounds are being explored and, in some cases, found.

A brief detour into the split and split-leather market reveals its own tension. In Europe, much depends on how splits are used. On the one hand, declining production starves specific applications of supply. Paradoxically, suede splits see solid demand in difficult times because nubuck and velour aesthetics receive special attention. Yet available split material as a tannery by-product is currently scarce. On the other hand, the protein industry is similarly constrained by reduced leather production and supply. Here too, by-product from tanneries is lacking, although substitution via whole hides is technically possible in some cases. Trade flows need to adapt to a new baseline, and that requires time, predictable price levels and adapted processing. For tanneries considering protein production as a bridge, the relatively simple process can load capacity short term, but it delivers sustainable returns only if margins justify opportunity costs. As a stop-gap it may work; as a long-term backbone it risks tying up capital without adequate yields.

Expectations for the near term are sober. Raw-material suppliers must digest outcomes from recent industry events and client takeaways and convert them into pricing. Under normal conditions, European slaughterhouse prices for bovine hides should move down, especially the higher-priced, predominantly male categories. Strategic or political market-share battles may resist such moves, despite lacking a basis in market reality. To keep material flowing, market-conforming prices are needed, and for several (still highly priced) hide types those levels seem low.

A recurring year-end issue is inventory valuation: price reductions force write-downs, and tanneries with heavy stocks will factor this into decisions. Again this is a financial artifact rather than a reflection of true market dynamics. Looking at the global price grid, Europe shows a clear need for adjustment. It will come sooner or later; the question is whether it arrives in an orderly, forward-looking manner or as a reactive wave that rolls through the chain.

Against this backdrop, Europe’s leather industry faces urgent problems. Time is short. There is a widespread sense that the challenge has been recognised, but the responses are not yet convincing. Hope is not a strategy. What works immediately is customer proximity. That means smaller lots, reliable repeatability, fast service and clear data from hide to customer lot. In the medium term, clusters, training pipelines, open interfaces and disciplined specification management across sites are decisive. Strategically, the critical lever is brands’ deliberate choice in favour of leather. Only when leather is used as a true differentiator do its strengths compound across a product’s life.

In short, leather holds its ground in high-spec segments by virtue of usage advantages, while visual alternatives dominate mass production. The path to resilience for European producers runs through speed, service excellence, data-based quality and truthful storytelling. Lineapelle and its companion shows provide the stage, the contacts and the reality check. The outcome will depend on how quickly the industry translates the right conclusions into processes, prices, portfolios and communication.

Share this story: